The referenced time period seems to conflate doubtlessly disparate ideas. The phrase suggests a determine, the “bagman,” concerned in illicit or questionable monetary transactions. This determine is then juxtaposed with “regulation and order,” a phrase sometimes related to strict adherence to authorized frameworks and the upkeep of social stability by way of regulation enforcement. The juxtaposition implies a contradiction or irony, the place somebody seemingly flouting the regulation is described as supporting or benefiting from a system of regulation and order. For instance, one may describe a corrupt official who earnings from unlawful actions whereas publicly advocating for stricter regulation enforcement for example of this perceived contradiction.
The importance of such a characterization lies in its potential to erode public belief in establishments and the rule of regulation. When people perceived as undermining the authorized system are concurrently seen as benefiting from it, it will probably foster cynicism and a perception that the system is inherently unfair or corrupt. Traditionally, situations of corruption and perceived hypocrisy inside regulation enforcement and authorities have led to social unrest, requires reform, and a decline in citizen engagement. The advantages, if any, are restricted to these instantly concerned within the illicit actions, whereas the broader societal prices might be substantial.
